The biggest problem in interpersonal relations is that most people see their opinions as the only true one. You'll probably have seen the people quarreling, each of whom was convinced that it is He's right. Entering this approach in the dispute are standing on a losing position, because the attitude of "I'm right" makes your companion argument "take the same position and trying to convince each other that the other is wrong. Much can be achieved in relations between people, asking, urging and convincing but the fighting can not achieve anything. When you want to show another person (such as his girlfriend), and that is wrong is wrong, you are unlikely to solve the original problem. Something about what the person arguing with you is now less important to her. Maybe if you asked a few minutes before it or talk about it calmly, then she would do it without a word. However, if fulfilled quarrel, in which you want to show her that it was you and you 're right, it is wrong, the matter is somewhat complicated. At this point she is not fighting for the subject argument, but the balloons human pride, which every person possesses. Now, even if it knows itself acted badly, you have little chance of that, to acknowledge error. The man has something that is often a consequence of endogenous name. In other words, every man is born with a mechanism therefore saved from his childhood in the genes. This mechanism makes every man with enormous force aims to ensure that in the eyes of other people as well as his own, be a consistent. I am sure that not once have you to defend an opinion on which you were not totally convinced. If you have such experience then you know what I'm talking about writing endogenous consequences. Zabrnąłeś so far in the argument that it may be silly to say, "Listen, you're right and I wrong.". The mere thought of such behavior by przyprawiała you chills.
| |
|